All news

AI News8 min readBy JH Akash

Gemini 4 Hydrogen: 2.5x Faster, $1.50 Per 1M

Google's Gemini 4 Hydrogen is 2.5x faster than Gemini 3.8 Flash, scores 57% on Terminal-Bench 4.1, and costs $1.50 per 1M input tokens. Here is the full breakdown.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen infographic: 2.5x faster than Gemini 3.8 Flash, $1.50 per 1M input tokens, 57% Terminal-Bench 4.1, 51 AI Index

Google launched Gemini 4 Hydrogen on November 12, 2026, and it is the third member of the Gemini 4 family to arrive in under two weeks. Where Carbon is the heavy reasoner and Argon is the frontier thinker, Hydrogen is the worker: a fast execution model built for everyday coding, debugging, and agentic workflows. It is also the first Gemini 4 model that free users can actually try.

The headline numbers are striking. Google says Hydrogen finishes tasks 2.5 times faster than Gemini 3.8 Flash, scores 57% on Terminal-Bench 4.1 against Flash's 18.2%, and even edges past the bigger Argon on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index. All of that at $1.50 per million input tokens, with a free API tier included. Here is the full breakdown, with every benchmark marked as vendor-reported where it comes from Google.

Gemini 4 Hydrogen at a glance

FactDetail
Launch dateNovember 12, 2026
RoleFast execution model for coding and agents
Input price$1.50 per 1M tokens
Output price$7.50 per 1M tokens
Context window1M tokens (shared input, thinking, and output)
Thinking levelslow, medium, high (default), xhigh
AI Index (high)51, one point above Argon
AI Index (xhigh)54
Terminal-Bench 4.157% vs 18.2% for Gemini 3.8 Flash
Free API tierYes, unlike Carbon
Knowledge cutoffMarch 2026

Hydrogen vs Carbon vs Argon: the Gemini 4 family

Google now has three Gemini 4 models, and they are not three sizes of the same thing. They are three jobs. Carbon plans and reasons over long horizons, Argon handles frontier reasoning, and Hydrogen executes fast. Google's own framing is that Carbon and Argon do the long-horizon thinking while Hydrogen does the rapid execution.

ModelRoleAI IndexInput price per 1M
Gemini 4 CarbonLong-horizon engineering and security60$2.00
Gemini 4 Hydrogen (xhigh)Fast execution, max thinking54$1.50
Gemini 4 Hydrogen (high)Fast execution, default thinking51$1.50
Gemini 4 ArgonFrontier reasoning50Not stated

Hydrogen beating Argon by a point on the Intelligence Index at default settings is the surprise of this launch. Argon launched only about four weeks earlier as the bigger frontier model. Hydrogen also sits close to Claude Sonnet 5.5 and GPT-6.1 Sol on the same index at xhigh, while Artificial Analysis puts its cost per task at about $1.87 at high thinking and $3.16 at xhigh, roughly a third of what Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max) costs at a similar intelligence level.

If you want the Carbon side of the family, read our Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5.2 comparison, where Carbon's $2 input price meets Claude's $8.

Terminal-Bench 4.1 chart: Gemini 4 Hydrogen 57% vs Gemini 3.8 Flash 18.2%

Benchmarks: where Hydrogen wins, and where it does not

Google's reported numbers are strong, but they are Google's numbers, and the model card itself notes that non-Gemini comparisons use providers' self-reported figures unless stated otherwise. Treat this table as a vendor-reported snapshot, not an independent verdict.

BenchmarkGemini 4 HydrogenWhat it means
Terminal-Bench 4.157% (Flash: 18.2%)Terminal coding tasks, more than 3x Flash
Terminal-Bench 4.054%Weaker than Carbon's 65.2% here
Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index51 (high), 54 (xhigh)Above Argon (50), below Carbon (60)
HLE-Diamond58.8%Leads its class on hard reasoning
Vals Tax Agent Bench52.3%Ranked 1st of 85 models
Vals Legal Research Bench55.8%Tied for 1st overall
Multimodal Knowledge Agent53.4%Long documents, spreadsheets, video
Agents' Last Exam v1.171.6%Long-horizon agent tasks
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.151.4%Below Carbon's 64.8%

Two caveats matter. First, on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and Terminal-Bench-Science, Hydrogen trails Carbon clearly, so the 4.1 headline does not mean it beats Carbon at terminal work. Second, Google says partners testing complex graphs, SQL, and data-heavy enterprise workflows saw Hydrogen run 2x to 2.8x faster with 12% to 23% lower token usage than 3.8 Flash, which is a partner result, not a public benchmark.

Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index chart: Gemini 4 Carbon 60, Gemini 4 Hydrogen xhigh 54, high 51, Gemini 4 Argon 50

Pricing: $1.50 in, $7.50 out, flat across 1M tokens

ModelInput per 1MOutput per 1MNotes
Gemini 4 Hydrogen$1.50$7.50Free API tier available; cache hits $0.075
Gemini 3.8 Flash$0.75$3.75Until Dec 31, 2026, then rises to $1.50/$7.50
Gemini 4 Carbon$2.00Not statedPaid tier only, no free tier
Claude Fable 5.2$8.00Not statedAnthropic flagship, Nov 9 launch

The pricing is flat across the whole 1-million-token window, which is unusual. There is no long-context surcharge. Cached input costs just $0.075 per million tokens.

The catch is the Flash price rise. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/$3.75 today, half of Hydrogen, but Google raises Flash to exactly Hydrogen's $1.50/$7.50 on January 1, 2027. After that date there is no price reason left to stay on Flash, and Hydrogen is the better model on every benchmark Google published. If you run Flash in production, plan the switch before the new year.

The four thinking levels are the real cost control. Artificial Analysis puts the cost per task at about $0.80 on low thinking, $1.87 on high, and $3.16 on xhigh. Pick the level per job instead of paying for maximum reasoning on every call.

The Antigravity Orchestrator: Carbon plans, Hydrogen executes

Hydrogen's most interesting feature is not the model alone, it is how Google pairs it with Carbon in Antigravity's new Orchestrator. Carbon starts in a read-only phase, explores dependencies, resolves ambiguities, and builds a concrete plan with explicit re-planning triggers. Hydrogen then takes over to write edits, update packages, and run tests. If Hydrogen hits friction, it hands back to Carbon to inspect the state, repair the plan, and resume execution.

Google says Orchestrator reached near-Carbon task success on Terminal-Bench 4.0 while using 24% less quota and finishing 19% faster on average. That is the multi-model routing idea made concrete: pay frontier prices only for the planning step, and let the fast model do the volume work. Tens of thousands of swarms have already launched on Antigravity since Carbon and the swarm feature debuted, according to Google.

Safety and reliability: built for agents that touch real systems

Agent models that run tools need guardrails, and Google published unusual detail here. Hydrogen cuts agentic overreach by up to 81% and under-service by up to 79% versus 3.8 Flash, which means fewer cases of the model doing too much or too little on its own. It is also more than 2.3 times more resilient to indirect prompt injection on the Gray Swan IPI benchmark, where attackers plant instructions in tool output rather than in the user's prompt. Google also reports a 12x cut in misaligned actions and task shortcutting, 96.7% honesty, and 99.9% chain-of-thought legibility. All vendor-reported, but the direction is clear: this model is tuned to be supervised safely, not just to be fast.

Where to use it, and where not to

Hydrogen is available now in Google AI Studio, the Gemini API, the Gemini app, Google Search, Gemini for business, and Antigravity for paid Google AI Pro and Ultra subscribers. It is the first Gemini 4 model on the free tier, so anyone can test it without a paid plan.

Use Hydrogen when: you run coding agents, repository work, debugging, interactive web development, or high-volume multimodal workflows where latency and cost per task matter more than maximum reasoning depth. Use it as the execution worker under Carbon in Antigravity Orchestrator.

Use Carbon or Argon instead when: the task needs long-horizon planning, deep scientific reasoning, or the hardest terminal benchmarks, where Carbon's 65.2% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 and 64.8% on Terminal-Bench-Science still lead. If you need the strongest Claude option for the same kind of work, see our Claude Opus 5.5 breakdown.

For teams building production agents on top of models like this, our AI agent development services cover the eval-first workflow that keeps agents working after launch, and if you want a team to run it for you, here is how to hire an AI automation agency.

Which to pick: the short version

Your situationPick
Daily coding, debugging, fast agent loopsGemini 4 Hydrogen (high)
Maximum quality per task, cost is secondaryGemini 4 Hydrogen (xhigh) or Carbon
Long-horizon planning and architectureGemini 4 Carbon, or Orchestrator
Still on Gemini 3.8 FlashSwitch to Hydrogen before Jan 1, 2027
Just testing the Gemini 4 familyHydrogen free tier

FAQ

Is Gemini 4 Hydrogen free?

Partly. Hydrogen is the first Gemini 4 model with a free API tier, rate-limited, in Google AI Studio. It is also rolling out to free users in the Gemini app and Google Search. Paid API use costs $1.50 per million input tokens and $7.50 per million output tokens.

How fast is Gemini 4 Hydrogen compared to Gemini 3.8 Flash?

Google says Hydrogen finishes tasks 2.5 times faster than Gemini 3.8 Flash at its default high thinking level. On Terminal-Bench 4.1 it scores 57% against Flash's 18.2%, and Google reports it makes up facts more than five times less often. These are Google-reported figures.

What is the difference between Gemini 4 Hydrogen, Carbon, and Argon?

Carbon is the long-horizon engineering and security flagship with the highest scores (AI Index 60). Argon is the frontier reasoning model (AI Index 50). Hydrogen is the fast execution model for coding and agents (AI Index 51 at high, 54 at xhigh), adapted from Carbon, cheaper than both at $1.50 per million input tokens, and the only one with a free tier.

What are the four thinking levels in Gemini 4 Hydrogen?

Low, medium, high (the default), and a new xhigh setting. Higher thinking raises quality and cost: Artificial Analysis puts the cost per task at about $0.80 on low, $1.87 on high, and $3.16 on xhigh. Pick the level per job to control spend.

Should I switch from Gemini 3.8 Flash to Hydrogen now?

Yes, if you use Flash for coding or agents. Hydrogen beats Flash on every benchmark Google published, and Flash's price rises to match Hydrogen exactly on January 1, 2027. Test Hydrogen on the free tier first, then move production workloads before the price rise removes the reason to stay.

When did Gemini 4 Hydrogen launch?

November 12, 2026, announced by Google DeepMind. It rolled out the same day across Google AI Studio, the Gemini API, the Gemini app, Google Search, Gemini for business, and Antigravity for paid Pro and Ultra subscribers.

  • Gemini 4 Hydrogen
  • Google Gemini
  • Gemini 4 Carbon
  • AI benchmarks
  • AI pricing
Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5.2 infographic: $2 vs $8 per 1M input tokens, 59 vs 65 AA Index, 88.2% SEC-bench Pro

AI News

Gemini 4 Carbon vs Claude Fable 5.2: $2 vs $8

Gemini 4 Carbon went generally available on Nov 10 at $2 per 1M input tokens, a quarter of Claude Fable 5.2's $8. Here is how the two flagships compare on benchmarks, price, and real work.

Claude Fable 5.2 infographic cover: AA Index 65, $8 per 1M input tokens, 30% faster, FrontierCode 49.1%

AI News

Claude Fable 5.2: #1 at 65, 20% Cheaper, 30% Faster

Anthropic launched Claude Fable 5.2 on Nov 9, 2026. It tops the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 65, costs 20% less than Fable 5.1 at $8/$40 per 1M tokens, and runs up to 30% faster. Here are the benchmarks, the price, and the catch.